<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 420 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350541</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the Financial Creditor in a case under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s non-payment of dues related to a power project led to insolvency proceedings. Despite disputes over loan restructuring and delays, the Tribunal admitted the outstanding amount, triggering the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and imposing a moratorium under Section 14 of the Code. The judgment prioritized legal compliance, granting the Financial Creditor recovery rights and appointing an Interim Resolution Professional, disregarding the Corporate Debtor&#039;s arguments of economic hardship or national interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 420 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350541</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the Financial Creditor in a case under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s non-payment of dues related to a power project led to insolvency proceedings. Despite disputes over loan restructuring and delays, the Tribunal admitted the outstanding amount, triggering the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and imposing a moratorium under Section 14 of the Code. The judgment prioritized legal compliance, granting the Financial Creditor recovery rights and appointing an Interim Resolution Professional, disregarding the Corporate Debtor&#039;s arguments of economic hardship or national interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>