<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 419 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350540</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside a penalty of Rs. 19 lakhs imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act for non-payment of service tax by the appellant, who had Cenvat credit available. The penalty was deemed unsustainable due to the revenue-neutral situation created by the available credit. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, reducing the penalty to Rs. 18,13,790 if the appellant paid 25% of the remaining penalty, along with service tax and interest within 30 days. The demand for service tax and interest was upheld, providing relief to the appellant in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 11:01:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 419 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350540</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside a penalty of Rs. 19 lakhs imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act for non-payment of service tax by the appellant, who had Cenvat credit available. The penalty was deemed unsustainable due to the revenue-neutral situation created by the available credit. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, reducing the penalty to Rs. 18,13,790 if the appellant paid 25% of the remaining penalty, along with service tax and interest within 30 days. The demand for service tax and interest was upheld, providing relief to the appellant in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>