https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350534 In clandestine removal disputes, duty liability may be sustained on seized documents, private records, stock discrepancies and corroborative statements, with proof assessed on preponderance of probability rather than mathematical precision. The Tribunal treated the evidence as sufficient to establish unaccounted manufacture and clearance, and upheld the central excise demand. On penalties and redemption fines, it considered the appellant-company's financial difficulties and reduced the quantum imposed on the company and a noticee, along with both redemption fines. en-us Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Nov 2017 11:00:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350534 In clandestine removal disputes, duty liability may be sustained on seized documents, private records, stock discrepancies and corroborative statements, with proof assessed on preponderance of probability rather than mathematical precision. The Tribunal treated the evidence as sufficient to establish unaccounted manufacture and clearance, and upheld the central excise demand. On penalties and redemption fines, it considered the appellant-company's financial difficulties and reduced the quantum imposed on the company and a noticee, along with both redemption fines. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350534