https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350520 The Tribunal found that the appellant had not committed any irregularity in availing the input service tax credit for renting of immovable property services. The Tribunal noted that the service tax was utilized to discharge tax liability on subletting services, and invoices later reflected the service tax separately. As a result, the demand for disallowance of the credit was deemed unjustified, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Nov 2017 10:59:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350520 The Tribunal found that the appellant had not committed any irregularity in availing the input service tax credit for renting of immovable property services. The Tribunal noted that the service tax was utilized to discharge tax liability on subletting services, and invoices later reflected the service tax separately. As a result, the demand for disallowance of the credit was deemed unjustified, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350520