https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195690 The appellate tribunal's power to pass such orders as it thinks fit under the SARFAESI framework was read broadly enough to include remand, so the remand order was valid. A person affected by enforcement measures could invoke the Section 17 remedy even if the person held only an agreement of sale, so maintainability was upheld. An agreement of sale executed by the borrower was not rendered void under Section 13(13); it remained subject to the bank's existing mortgage rights and could not defeat them. The writ petition therefore failed on the substantive issues, and expeditious disposal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal was directed. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195690 The appellate tribunal's power to pass such orders as it thinks fit under the SARFAESI framework was read broadly enough to include remand, so the remand order was valid. A person affected by enforcement measures could invoke the Section 17 remedy even if the person held only an agreement of sale, so maintainability was upheld. An agreement of sale executed by the borrower was not rendered void under Section 13(13); it remained subject to the bank's existing mortgage rights and could not defeat them. The writ petition therefore failed on the substantive issues, and expeditious disposal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal was directed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195690