<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2682 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195686</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions and deleting the additions made under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act for unexplained credits/loans. The Tribunal considered the nature of the business activities, the timing of cash credits, and the lack of commercial production to conclude that the cash credits were capital receipts rather than taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 19:33:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2682 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195686</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions and deleting the additions made under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act for unexplained credits/loans. The Tribunal considered the nature of the business activities, the timing of cash credits, and the lack of commercial production to conclude that the cash credits were capital receipts rather than taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>