https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195664 Chapter V-A of the NDPS Act applies to a detenue's relative where the original detention order has not been quashed, set aside, or withdrawn, and a prior challenge affecting only continued detention does not bar invocation of the forfeiture scheme. In forfeiture proceedings, the competent authority must record written reason to believe that property is illegally acquired, after which the burden shifts to the affected person to prove otherwise. The analysis also notes that nexus need not be established in the manner urged by the petitioner, and that new factual assertions raised for the first time in writ proceedings are not considered. en-us Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 14:48:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195664 Chapter V-A of the NDPS Act applies to a detenue's relative where the original detention order has not been quashed, set aside, or withdrawn, and a prior challenge affecting only continued detention does not bar invocation of the forfeiture scheme. In forfeiture proceedings, the competent authority must record written reason to believe that property is illegally acquired, after which the burden shifts to the affected person to prove otherwise. The analysis also notes that nexus need not be established in the manner urged by the petitioner, and that new factual assertions raised for the first time in writ proceedings are not considered. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195664