https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195659 Preventive detention was sustained where the detaining authority relied on independent material against the detenu, making the co-detenue's revocation and advisory opinion irrelevant to this case. The representation was processed without inordinate or unexplained delay after receipt, translation, and internal consideration, so no violation was found on that ground. The alleged absence of English translation of Malayalam documents was rejected because the translated materials had been supplied and the detenu could make an effective representation. The detention order was also supported by material showing smuggling-related activity and valid subjective satisfaction. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 11:15:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195659 Preventive detention was sustained where the detaining authority relied on independent material against the detenu, making the co-detenue's revocation and advisory opinion irrelevant to this case. The representation was processed without inordinate or unexplained delay after receipt, translation, and internal consideration, so no violation was found on that ground. The alleged absence of English translation of Malayalam documents was rejected because the translated materials had been supplied and the detenu could make an effective representation. The detention order was also supported by material showing smuggling-related activity and valid subjective satisfaction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195659