<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 674 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195658</link>
    <description>Finality bars a subsequent Article 32 habeas corpus petition where the same detention order, relief and grounds were already examined by the High Court and the dismissal was affirmed under Article 136. A fresh petition may be available only on changed circumstances or new grounds not previously available. Preventive detention may be ordered against a person in custody if the detaining authority is aware of that custody, has reliable material indicating a real possibility of release on bail, and records compelling reasons for detention. Service of the order during temporary custody does not itself invalidate it where release remains realistically possible and the underlying bail has not been cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 674 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195658</link>
      <description>Finality bars a subsequent Article 32 habeas corpus petition where the same detention order, relief and grounds were already examined by the High Court and the dismissal was affirmed under Article 136. A fresh petition may be available only on changed circumstances or new grounds not previously available. Preventive detention may be ordered against a person in custody if the detaining authority is aware of that custody, has reliable material indicating a real possibility of release on bail, and records compelling reasons for detention. Service of the order during temporary custody does not itself invalidate it where release remains realistically possible and the underlying bail has not been cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>