<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 391 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350512</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessee, an autonomous institution established by the Reserve Bank of India, was eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was held that the assessee&#039;s activities were not in the nature of trade, commerce, or business, and therefore did not fall under the proviso to Section 2(15). The Court also found that the applicability of Section 13(8) was moot due to the assessee not being engaged in trade, commerce, or business. The issue of double deduction of income was resolved in favor of the assessee based on prior judicial interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 391 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350512</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessee, an autonomous institution established by the Reserve Bank of India, was eligible for exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was held that the assessee&#039;s activities were not in the nature of trade, commerce, or business, and therefore did not fall under the proviso to Section 2(15). The Court also found that the applicability of Section 13(8) was moot due to the assessee not being engaged in trade, commerce, or business. The issue of double deduction of income was resolved in favor of the assessee based on prior judicial interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>