<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 389 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350510</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee against the department. The issues raised, including the addition of employee contributions to PF and ESI, payment for technical services not liable for TDS, and deletion of front-end fees as revenue expenditure, were all decided in favor of the assessee. The appeal was disposed of, with one issue subject to Special Leave Petition (SLP).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 389 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350510</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee against the department. The issues raised, including the addition of employee contributions to PF and ESI, payment for technical services not liable for TDS, and deletion of front-end fees as revenue expenditure, were all decided in favor of the assessee. The appeal was disposed of, with one issue subject to Special Leave Petition (SLP).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>