<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 387 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350508</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, dismissing the unsecured loans issue due to lack of creditor confirmation, remanding the bogus purchases issue for reconsideration to verify facts from invoices, and deleting the addition related to the difference in closing stock. The judgment provided detailed analysis and legal references to support each decision, ensuring a fair and thorough review of the issues raised in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 06:48:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 387 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350508</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, dismissing the unsecured loans issue due to lack of creditor confirmation, remanding the bogus purchases issue for reconsideration to verify facts from invoices, and deleting the addition related to the difference in closing stock. The judgment provided detailed analysis and legal references to support each decision, ensuring a fair and thorough review of the issues raised in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>