<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 58 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10478</link>
    <description>The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the investment allowance reserve was utilized for the purchase of plant and machinery, in compliance with section 32A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal challenging this finding was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial question of law. The respondent-assessee successfully demonstrated the proper utilization of the reserve, with factual evidence supporting the purchase exceeding the reserve amount. The Court emphasized the importance of factual findings in assessing compliance with statutory requirements, ultimately upholding the respondent-assessee&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 58 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10478</link>
      <description>The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the investment allowance reserve was utilized for the purchase of plant and machinery, in compliance with section 32A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal challenging this finding was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial question of law. The respondent-assessee successfully demonstrated the proper utilization of the reserve, with factual evidence supporting the purchase exceeding the reserve amount. The Court emphasized the importance of factual findings in assessing compliance with statutory requirements, ultimately upholding the respondent-assessee&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>