<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 379 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to re-examine the cost of construction with the help of the DVO and to reconsider the additional grounds and claims related to the interest paid on the loan facility. The exemption under Section 54 was allowed for one house, provided it was purchased in the name of the wife with the entire consideration flowing from the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 06:48:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 379 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to re-examine the cost of construction with the help of the DVO and to reconsider the additional grounds and claims related to the interest paid on the loan facility. The exemption under Section 54 was allowed for one house, provided it was purchased in the name of the wife with the entire consideration flowing from the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>