<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 376 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues, including transfer pricing adjustments, treatment of subsidies, and disallowances under Sections 14A and 115JB. The Tribunal emphasized principles such as real income and correct application of legal provisions, leading to the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer and Transfer Pricing Officer in several instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 06:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 376 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues, including transfer pricing adjustments, treatment of subsidies, and disallowances under Sections 14A and 115JB. The Tribunal emphasized principles such as real income and correct application of legal provisions, leading to the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer and Transfer Pricing Officer in several instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>