<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 366 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, granting exemption under sections 11 and 12 for transportation and games activities, allowing depreciation on assets, and canceling penalties under section 271(1)(c). However, the disallowance of provident fund interest expenses was upheld. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of disallowances related to sports and transportation activities was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 22:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 366 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, granting exemption under sections 11 and 12 for transportation and games activities, allowing depreciation on assets, and canceling penalties under section 271(1)(c). However, the disallowance of provident fund interest expenses was upheld. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of disallowances related to sports and transportation activities was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>