https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350482 The court directed the 4th respondent not to sell seized goods until the Revision Application's decision, acknowledging potential harm to the petitioner's interests. It instructed the 3rd respondent to promptly consider the Revision Application, ideally within four months. The court disposed of the writ petition with these directives, emphasizing no costs were to be incurred. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 06:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350482 The court directed the 4th respondent not to sell seized goods until the Revision Application's decision, acknowledging potential harm to the petitioner's interests. It instructed the 3rd respondent to promptly consider the Revision Application, ideally within four months. The court disposed of the writ petition with these directives, emphasizing no costs were to be incurred. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350482