<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 352 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the demand for service tax on the sale of food and beverages, as documentary evidence supported the assessee&#039;s position. However, due to uncertainties regarding the doctrine of mutuality and quantification errors in the demand calculation, the Tribunal referred the matter back to the adjudicating authority for further review in light of pending Supreme Court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2017 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 352 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the demand for service tax on the sale of food and beverages, as documentary evidence supported the assessee&#039;s position. However, due to uncertainties regarding the doctrine of mutuality and quantification errors in the demand calculation, the Tribunal referred the matter back to the adjudicating authority for further review in light of pending Supreme Court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>