<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 342 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350463</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, remitting the matter back to the first authority to ensure the supply of necessary documents to the appellant. The Tribunal and Commissioner (Appeals) orders were set aside, emphasizing the significance of document disclosure in upholding principles of natural justice and fair adjudication processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 342 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350463</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, remitting the matter back to the first authority to ensure the supply of necessary documents to the appellant. The Tribunal and Commissioner (Appeals) orders were set aside, emphasizing the significance of document disclosure in upholding principles of natural justice and fair adjudication processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>