<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 16 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10471</link>
    <description>Kist payable to the State Government was characterised as a rental liability, not a statutory impost in the nature of tax, duty, cess or fee. Section 43B applies only to specified statutory liabilities and cannot be extended to amounts outside that class. Following earlier authority, unpaid kist was held not to fall within section 43B, so deduction could not be disallowed merely because payment had not been made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 16 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10471</link>
      <description>Kist payable to the State Government was characterised as a rental liability, not a statutory impost in the nature of tax, duty, cess or fee. Section 43B applies only to specified statutory liabilities and cannot be extended to amounts outside that class. Following earlier authority, unpaid kist was held not to fall within section 43B, so deduction could not be disallowed merely because payment had not been made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>