<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1486 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195640</link>
    <description>The appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on service tax paid for advertising services. The Member (J) held that the appellant paid the service tax based on the bill issued by the advertising agency, and the jurisdictional officers had no authority to bifurcate the taxable value. The denial of credit, interest, and penalty was deemed unsustainable. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 21:04:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1486 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195640</link>
      <description>The appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on service tax paid for advertising services. The Member (J) held that the appellant paid the service tax based on the bill issued by the advertising agency, and the jurisdictional officers had no authority to bifurcate the taxable value. The denial of credit, interest, and penalty was deemed unsustainable. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>