<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1132 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195651</link>
    <description>A criminal court cannot review or recall its own final bail order in the guise of cancellation, because Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure bars alteration of a signed final order except for clerical or arithmetical error. Cancellation under Section 439(2) is a distinct power and must rest on legally permissible grounds before a competent court, not on the same court revisiting its own decision. Bail granted under Section 167(2) is a statutory default release, but it still cannot be set aside by the same court through review proceedings merely on the footing that it was wrongly granted. The text states that the earlier grant of bail stood restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 21:04:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1132 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195651</link>
      <description>A criminal court cannot review or recall its own final bail order in the guise of cancellation, because Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure bars alteration of a signed final order except for clerical or arithmetical error. Cancellation under Section 439(2) is a distinct power and must rest on legally permissible grounds before a competent court, not on the same court revisiting its own decision. Bail granted under Section 167(2) is a statutory default release, but it still cannot be set aside by the same court through review proceedings merely on the footing that it was wrongly granted. The text states that the earlier grant of bail stood restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>