<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1279 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195633</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, excluding companies with different functions or extraordinary profits due to brand value from being comparables. The judgment addressed the determination of arms length price, selection of comparable companies, objections by the assessee, and the appeal before the Tribunal regarding comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1279 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195633</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, excluding companies with different functions or extraordinary profits due to brand value from being comparables. The judgment addressed the determination of arms length price, selection of comparable companies, objections by the assessee, and the appeal before the Tribunal regarding comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>