https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195626 Back wages for illegal termination under Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act are not automatic and must be assessed on the facts of each case. Applying the principles underlying Section 25F, the Court held that relief may be moulded where the workman was on daily wages, the employment was for a fixed term, the establishment had closed, and there was no pleading or proof of total unemployment. The burden on gainful employment lies initially on the workman, and industrial adjudication must remain pragmatic. Full back wages were therefore refused, and the relief was confined to 25% back wages with compensation under Section 6-N. en-us Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2024 16:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195626 Back wages for illegal termination under Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act are not automatic and must be assessed on the facts of each case. Applying the principles underlying Section 25F, the Court held that relief may be moulded where the workman was on daily wages, the employment was for a fixed term, the establishment had closed, and there was no pleading or proof of total unemployment. The burden on gainful employment lies initially on the workman, and industrial adjudication must remain pragmatic. Full back wages were therefore refused, and the relief was confined to 25% back wages with compensation under Section 6-N. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195626