<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 520 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195616</link>
    <description>Where a later company petition and an earlier civil suit between substantially the same parties raise directly and substantially the same issues, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires the later proceeding to be stayed. The disputed resignation letter, share transfer documents, and the petitioner&#039;s status as director and member were common to both matters, and the earlier suit was pending before a competent court. Because a decision in the suit could affect the company petition and the parties and issues were materially identical, the mandatory bar under Section 10 applied. The company petition was therefore stayed until disposal of the civil suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 10:01:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 520 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195616</link>
      <description>Where a later company petition and an earlier civil suit between substantially the same parties raise directly and substantially the same issues, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires the later proceeding to be stayed. The disputed resignation letter, share transfer documents, and the petitioner&#039;s status as director and member were common to both matters, and the earlier suit was pending before a competent court. Because a decision in the suit could affect the company petition and the parties and issues were materially identical, the mandatory bar under Section 10 applied. The company petition was therefore stayed until disposal of the civil suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>