<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 328 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350449</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the challenge to re-opening of assessment for the years 2010-11 and 2011-12 under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer was allowed to complete the assessment based on unverified transactions from earlier years, despite the petitioner&#039;s objections. The Writ Petitions were dismissed, granting the petitioner the liberty to pursue remedies post-assessment, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 328 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350449</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the challenge to re-opening of assessment for the years 2010-11 and 2011-12 under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer was allowed to complete the assessment based on unverified transactions from earlier years, despite the petitioner&#039;s objections. The Writ Petitions were dismissed, granting the petitioner the liberty to pursue remedies post-assessment, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>