<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 314 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350435</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 153C of the Income Tax Act, finding it applicable to the assessee&#039;s partnership firm. However, it set aside the orders due to the incorrect invocation of section 153C without referencing seized material. The tribunal also validated the estimation of income based on loose sheets found during a survey, directing the assessing officer to calculate profits accordingly. Regarding depreciation, interest on partners&#039; capital, and remuneration, deductions were allowed as per partnership deed provisions. The unexplained cash credit in the Pushkara capital account was upheld, emphasizing the requirement for tangible evidence to justify the source. The tribunal granted partial relief for the assessment year 2008-09, with specific adjustments mandated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:49:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 314 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350435</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 153C of the Income Tax Act, finding it applicable to the assessee&#039;s partnership firm. However, it set aside the orders due to the incorrect invocation of section 153C without referencing seized material. The tribunal also validated the estimation of income based on loose sheets found during a survey, directing the assessing officer to calculate profits accordingly. Regarding depreciation, interest on partners&#039; capital, and remuneration, deductions were allowed as per partnership deed provisions. The unexplained cash credit in the Pushkara capital account was upheld, emphasizing the requirement for tangible evidence to justify the source. The tribunal granted partial relief for the assessment year 2008-09, with specific adjustments mandated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>