<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Exempting Sub-Contracted Services from Service Tax to Prevent Double Taxation Chaos.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36759</link>
    <description>Erection, commissioning and installation service - sub-contract - double taxation - If the argument of the appellant is accepted then every provision of services to another taxable service provider would not be liable to payment of service. This situation can only lead to chaos.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:47:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:47:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Exempting Sub-Contracted Services from Service Tax to Prevent Double Taxation Chaos.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36759</link>
      <description>Erection, commissioning and installation service - sub-contract - double taxation - If the argument of the appellant is accepted then every provision of services to another taxable service provider would not be liable to payment of service. This situation can only lead to chaos.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:47:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>