<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 296 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350417</link>
    <description>Refund claims relating to service tax on construction of residential apartments were not finally rejected where the dispute was already covered by earlier identical Tribunal decisions and the applicable Board circular. The Tribunal held that the proper course was to set aside the rejection and remit the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication. The claimants must be given an opportunity to produce the required documents and details, and the authority must consider the earlier connected Tribunal directions before deciding the claims again.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:47:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 296 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350417</link>
      <description>Refund claims relating to service tax on construction of residential apartments were not finally rejected where the dispute was already covered by earlier identical Tribunal decisions and the applicable Board circular. The Tribunal held that the proper course was to set aside the rejection and remit the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication. The claimants must be given an opportunity to produce the required documents and details, and the authority must consider the earlier connected Tribunal directions before deciding the claims again.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>