<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 292 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision allowing a refund claim for unutilized CENVAT credit of service tax by the respondents engaged in IT Software Services export. The Revenue&#039;s challenge based on lack of Service Tax registration for the refund was dismissed. Legal precedents cited, including a Karnataka HC decision, supported that registration was not mandatory for claiming the credit. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of legal precedents in determining refund validity, affirming that Service Tax registration was not a prerequisite for the refund claim. The decision highlighted the importance of legal clarity and consistency in tax refund disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:47:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 292 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision allowing a refund claim for unutilized CENVAT credit of service tax by the respondents engaged in IT Software Services export. The Revenue&#039;s challenge based on lack of Service Tax registration for the refund was dismissed. Legal precedents cited, including a Karnataka HC decision, supported that registration was not mandatory for claiming the credit. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of legal precedents in determining refund validity, affirming that Service Tax registration was not a prerequisite for the refund claim. The decision highlighted the importance of legal clarity and consistency in tax refund disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>