<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 287 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350408</link>
    <description>The court upheld the demand of excise duty on appellants for exceeding the exemption limit for SSI units and clearing trailers without payment. The contention for captive use exemption was dismissed. The time-barred show-cause notice was deemed valid due to suppression of facts, with a demand calculation error requiring rectification. Personal penalties on directors were upheld, while the penalty on the trading company was set aside. The judgment was pronounced on 31/10/2017, disposing of all appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 287 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350408</link>
      <description>The court upheld the demand of excise duty on appellants for exceeding the exemption limit for SSI units and clearing trailers without payment. The contention for captive use exemption was dismissed. The time-barred show-cause notice was deemed valid due to suppression of facts, with a demand calculation error requiring rectification. Personal penalties on directors were upheld, while the penalty on the trading company was set aside. The judgment was pronounced on 31/10/2017, disposing of all appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>