https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350404 The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding one issue for further examination regarding the denial of cenvat credit on certain services due to a clerical mistake. However, the appeal was dismissed on the second issue of cenvat credit taken on invoices issued in the name of CHA for services related to imports, as the documentation did not comply with Service Tax Rules. The tribunal upheld the invocation of the extended period of limitation and the penalty imposed in this regard. en-us Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350404 The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding one issue for further examination regarding the denial of cenvat credit on certain services due to a clerical mistake. However, the appeal was dismissed on the second issue of cenvat credit taken on invoices issued in the name of CHA for services related to imports, as the documentation did not comply with Service Tax Rules. The tribunal upheld the invocation of the extended period of limitation and the penalty imposed in this regard. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350404