<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 279 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the demand and penalty for availing CENVAT credit for services related to plant shifting. Penalties for non-reversal of CENVAT credit for job work goods and without determination of demand were also overturned. However, the appellant&#039;s admission of liability for excess CENVAT credit resulted in upholding the demand, interest, and penalty for that amount. The final decision was rendered on October 13, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:46:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 279 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the demand and penalty for availing CENVAT credit for services related to plant shifting. Penalties for non-reversal of CENVAT credit for job work goods and without determination of demand were also overturned. However, the appellant&#039;s admission of liability for excess CENVAT credit resulted in upholding the demand, interest, and penalty for that amount. The final decision was rendered on October 13, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>