https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195601 The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal by restoring the AO's disallowance of commission due to lack of evidence establishing the services rendered, and remanding the issue of partner remuneration for fresh verification. However, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the disallowance of interest, business promotion expenses, and disallowance under section 14A due to the absence of exempt income. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Nov 2017 21:39:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195601 The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal by restoring the AO's disallowance of commission due to lack of evidence establishing the services rendered, and remanding the issue of partner remuneration for fresh verification. However, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the disallowance of interest, business promotion expenses, and disallowance under section 14A due to the absence of exempt income. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195601