<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 69 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10454</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act. It found the notices were within the limitation period and issued in compliance with the requirement of recording reasons. The reassessment was deemed justified as it was in consequence of a court order awarding interest on compensation. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 69 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10454</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act. It found the notices were within the limitation period and issued in compliance with the requirement of recording reasons. The reassessment was deemed justified as it was in consequence of a court order awarding interest on compensation. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>