<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1104 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal against a penalty of only Rs. 13,874 under the Wealth Tax Act was not maintainable due to the low tax effect. It was determined that the CBDT instructions on monetary limits for filing appeals in direct tax matters applied to wealth-tax cases, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the cross-objection by the assessee as infructuous. The Tribunal clarified that in penalty appeals, the tax effect refers to the amount of penalty reduced or deleted, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1104 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal against a penalty of only Rs. 13,874 under the Wealth Tax Act was not maintainable due to the low tax effect. It was determined that the CBDT instructions on monetary limits for filing appeals in direct tax matters applied to wealth-tax cases, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the cross-objection by the assessee as infructuous. The Tribunal clarified that in penalty appeals, the tax effect refers to the amount of penalty reduced or deleted, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>