https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195573 The court dismissed the petitions, affirming that offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) are cognizable, requiring adherence to Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) procedures during investigations. It held that Additional Sessions Judges are competent to preside as Special Courts under PMLA. The court found the petitioner's arrest and custody lawful, denying the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Specific directions were given for the investigation to comply with CrPC provisions. en-us Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Nov 2017 10:04:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195573 The court dismissed the petitions, affirming that offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) are cognizable, requiring adherence to Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) procedures during investigations. It held that Additional Sessions Judges are competent to preside as Special Courts under PMLA. The court found the petitioner's arrest and custody lawful, denying the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Specific directions were given for the investigation to comply with CrPC provisions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195573