<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 15 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10446</link>
    <description>Conveyance and additional conveyance allowance is exempt under section 10(14)(ii) only when the amount is actually used for the prescribed official purpose. As no evidence was produced to show actual expenditure or actual use of the allowance in discharging official duties, the exemption claim failed and the allowance was taxable as salary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 15 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10446</link>
      <description>Conveyance and additional conveyance allowance is exempt under section 10(14)(ii) only when the amount is actually used for the prescribed official purpose. As no evidence was produced to show actual expenditure or actual use of the allowance in discharging official duties, the exemption claim failed and the allowance was taxable as salary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>