https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350382 The court granted the petitioner's requests to quash the Impugned Order-in-Original, direct the respondents to decide claims on merits, and restrain respondents from acting on impugned orders. The court criticized the Deputy Commissioner for contempt and ordered refunds of excess customs duty with interest. Contempt proceedings were initiated against officials, leading to refunds but resulting in costs and damages imposed on the Deputy Commissioner for unnecessary litigation. The court emphasized compliance with judicial precedents and refrained from contempt punishment, focusing on future adherence to court orders. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350382 The court granted the petitioner's requests to quash the Impugned Order-in-Original, direct the respondents to decide claims on merits, and restrain respondents from acting on impugned orders. The court criticized the Deputy Commissioner for contempt and ordered refunds of excess customs duty with interest. Contempt proceedings were initiated against officials, leading to refunds but resulting in costs and damages imposed on the Deputy Commissioner for unnecessary litigation. The court emphasized compliance with judicial precedents and refrained from contempt punishment, focusing on future adherence to court orders. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350382