<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 255 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350376</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s claim of suppression of facts by the appellant, leading to the dismissal of the extended period of limitation invocation. The case was remanded for further assessment on duty payment for the normal period, emphasizing compliance with legal principles and procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 255 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350376</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s claim of suppression of facts by the appellant, leading to the dismissal of the extended period of limitation invocation. The case was remanded for further assessment on duty payment for the normal period, emphasizing compliance with legal principles and procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>