<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 253 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350374</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing a 12.5% disallowance of the claimed amount for bogus purchases made from non-existent parties. The decision was based on the lack of evidence provided by the assessee to prove the genuineness of the transactions, with confirmation of the parties&#039; dubious nature by the Sales Tax Department. The Tribunal considered a 100% disallowance inappropriate due to no doubts on sales but deemed a 12.5% disallowance appropriate for tax evasion through grey market purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 08:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 253 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350374</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing a 12.5% disallowance of the claimed amount for bogus purchases made from non-existent parties. The decision was based on the lack of evidence provided by the assessee to prove the genuineness of the transactions, with confirmation of the parties&#039; dubious nature by the Sales Tax Department. The Tribunal considered a 100% disallowance inappropriate due to no doubts on sales but deemed a 12.5% disallowance appropriate for tax evasion through grey market purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>