<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 244 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to restrict the disallowance of alleged bogus purchases to 12.5% of the total amount. The Tribunal acknowledged that while the purchases were not entirely genuine, taxing only the profit element in such cases was appropriate. The decision partially favored the assessee by reducing the disallowance rate and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The ruling was issued on October 25, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 08:36:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 244 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to restrict the disallowance of alleged bogus purchases to 12.5% of the total amount. The Tribunal acknowledged that while the purchases were not entirely genuine, taxing only the profit element in such cases was appropriate. The decision partially favored the assessee by reducing the disallowance rate and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The ruling was issued on October 25, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>