<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 240 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the amount claimed by the Operational Creditor did not meet the criteria of &quot;Operational Debt&quot; under Section 5(21) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Petitioner was not considered an &quot;Operational Creditor&quot; under Section 5(20) of the Code. The existence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties further led to the dismissal of the Petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 240 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the amount claimed by the Operational Creditor did not meet the criteria of &quot;Operational Debt&quot; under Section 5(21) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Petitioner was not considered an &quot;Operational Creditor&quot; under Section 5(20) of the Code. The existence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties further led to the dismissal of the Petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>