<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 234 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350355</link>
    <description>Penalty was not justified where the Bill of Entry had been filed before withdrawal of the exemption, and duty with interest was paid before adjudication. On the facts recorded, there was no material showing deliberate evasion or contumacious conduct, so the penal consequence was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 08:35:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 234 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350355</link>
      <description>Penalty was not justified where the Bill of Entry had been filed before withdrawal of the exemption, and duty with interest was paid before adjudication. On the facts recorded, there was no material showing deliberate evasion or contumacious conduct, so the penal consequence was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>