<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 229 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350350</link>
    <description>The Appeals, challenging Order-in-Appeals regarding Cenvat credit reversal on bagasse removal during sugar-related product manufacturing, were consolidated. The Appellants, disputing the revenue&#039;s demand for credit reversal, relied on tribunal decisions and an Apex Court judgment. The revenue argued for credit reversal on electricity supplied to the grid. The Judicial Member favored the Appellants, citing tribunal consistency and the Apex Court&#039;s stance on bagasse not being a manufactured product. Relying on a recent Apex Court judgment, the Member ruled in favor of the Appellants, setting aside the impugned orders on 21.09.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 08:34:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 229 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350350</link>
      <description>The Appeals, challenging Order-in-Appeals regarding Cenvat credit reversal on bagasse removal during sugar-related product manufacturing, were consolidated. The Appellants, disputing the revenue&#039;s demand for credit reversal, relied on tribunal decisions and an Apex Court judgment. The revenue argued for credit reversal on electricity supplied to the grid. The Judicial Member favored the Appellants, citing tribunal consistency and the Apex Court&#039;s stance on bagasse not being a manufactured product. Relying on a recent Apex Court judgment, the Member ruled in favor of the Appellants, setting aside the impugned orders on 21.09.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>