<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 220 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350341</link>
    <description>Cost of cylinders used in printing is includible in the assessable value of printed polyethylene films, even when recovered separately as cylinder making or engraving charges. The Tribunal relied on prior decisions, including the larger Bench view and Apex Court affirmation, to confirm that a separate invoice head does not exclude such charges from valuation. The demand, together with consequential interest and penalty, was sustained and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 08:34:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 220 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350341</link>
      <description>Cost of cylinders used in printing is includible in the assessable value of printed polyethylene films, even when recovered separately as cylinder making or engraving charges. The Tribunal relied on prior decisions, including the larger Bench view and Apex Court affirmation, to confirm that a separate invoice head does not exclude such charges from valuation. The demand, together with consequential interest and penalty, was sustained and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>