<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 214 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350335</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that advances paid for the purchase of plots should not be considered as part of the net wealth for wealth tax assessment. The Tribunal found that such advances did not fall within the definition of taxable assets under the Wealth Tax Act and, therefore, set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 08:34:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 214 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350335</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that advances paid for the purchase of plots should not be considered as part of the net wealth for wealth tax assessment. The Tribunal found that such advances did not fall within the definition of taxable assets under the Wealth Tax Act and, therefore, set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>