<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 56 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10440</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in a tax matter for the assessment year 1988-89 under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the importance of reasons in quasi-judicial decisions. The Court noted that the Revenue&#039;s failure to challenge a similar order for the previous assessment year precluded challenging the current order. However, the Court found the Tribunal&#039;s order lacking reasons and stressed the necessity of providing reasons in quasi-judicial decisions for transparency and fairness. Consequently, the Court partly allowed the appeal, directing the Tribunal to provide cogent reasons while deciding the matter afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 56 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10440</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in a tax matter for the assessment year 1988-89 under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the importance of reasons in quasi-judicial decisions. The Court noted that the Revenue&#039;s failure to challenge a similar order for the previous assessment year precluded challenging the current order. However, the Court found the Tribunal&#039;s order lacking reasons and stressed the necessity of providing reasons in quasi-judicial decisions for transparency and fairness. Consequently, the Court partly allowed the appeal, directing the Tribunal to provide cogent reasons while deciding the matter afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>