<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 65 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10439</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that factual determinations regarding valuation methods and account maintenance are not legal issues. The court dismissed the appeals, ruling that they did not raise any legal questions, and each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 65 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10439</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that factual determinations regarding valuation methods and account maintenance are not legal issues. The court dismissed the appeals, ruling that they did not raise any legal questions, and each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>