https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195553 The Supreme Court examined CPC amendment provisions on summons, alternative dispute resolution, intra-court appeals, rejection of plaint, witness examination, additional evidence and appeal registry, and held the amended scheme constitutionally valid. It construed the summons amendment as requiring timely steps for issuance, not actual service within the period. It treated Section 89 as introducing structured ADR, upheld the bar on further appeal under Section 100A, and read the plaint-rejection and evidence provisions as procedural and workable. It also interpreted Order 41 Rule 9 as requiring filing of the appeal memorandum copy in the lower court without making that filing a condition for maintainability, while directing model rules for effective implementation. en-us Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Nov 2017 17:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195553 The Supreme Court examined CPC amendment provisions on summons, alternative dispute resolution, intra-court appeals, rejection of plaint, witness examination, additional evidence and appeal registry, and held the amended scheme constitutionally valid. It construed the summons amendment as requiring timely steps for issuance, not actual service within the period. It treated Section 89 as introducing structured ADR, upheld the bar on further appeal under Section 100A, and read the plaint-rejection and evidence provisions as procedural and workable. It also interpreted Order 41 Rule 9 as requiring filing of the appeal memorandum copy in the lower court without making that filing a condition for maintainability, while directing model rules for effective implementation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195553